DeepSeek vs. ChatGPT: Which AI Model Delivers Best Responses?
- Chanchal Thilakan
- Mar 26
- 7 min read
The AI industry is evolving rapidly, and the recent release of DeepSeek has challenged established models like ChatGPT (GPT-4) with its efficiency-driven approach, cost-effectiveness, and open-source accessibility. But how do these models perform in real-world scenarios?
To assess their capabilities, we tested DeepSeek R1 (China) and ChatGPT (GPT-4, OpenAI) across four key categories:
Creative Writing
General Knowledge
Problem-Solving
Technical Understanding
Key Differences Between ChatGPT and DeepSeek
Feature | DeepSeek R1 (China) | ChatGPT (GPT-4, OpenAI) |
Training Cost | ~$5M (Highly cost-effective) | $100M+ (Expensive) |
GPUs Required | ~2,000 (Runs on gaming GPUs) | 100,000+ (Requires high-end data centers) |
Processing Efficiency | 8-bit computation (Uses 75% less memory) | 32-bit precision (Higher accuracy, resource-intensive) |
Token Processing | Reads full phrases (2x faster) | Reads word-by-word |
Parameter Activation | 37B active out of 671B (Optimized usage) | 1.8T active (Higher power consumption) |
API Pricing | 95% cheaper | More expensive |
Open Source? | Yes (Modifiable by anyone) | No (Closed-source) |
Multimodal Capabilities | No (Text only) | Yes (Text + Images with GPT-4V) |
Accuracy & Refinement | Matches GPT-4 in many tasks | More fine-tuned with Reinforcement Learning |
Both ChatGPT and DeepSeek offer powerful models
AI language models have advanced to a point where direct comparisons between them are becoming less meaningful. Unless you're exploring the absolute limits of what these models can do—which comes with its own set of challenges—most high-quality large language models (LLMs) deliver comparable results. Today’s AI models efficiently handle tasks such as drafting emails, editing blog posts, brainstorming ideas, making code suggestions, and much more.
ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: Available Models
As of February 2025, both ChatGPT and DeepSeek offer cutting-edge AI models:
ChatGPT Models:
GPT-4o
GPT-4o Mini
o1
o3-Mini
DeepSeek Models:
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek R1
In the charts above from Artificial Analysis, a comparative evaluation of various AI models across different benchmarks is presented. While there are some variations in performance, the differences are generally minimal. The most significant distinction lies between reasoning models and standard language models. Unless a task demands advanced analytical capabilities, most users can expect reliable performance from any of these models, as long as they are selected based on the specific requirements of the task.
ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: A Feature and Performance Comparison
ChatGPT Offers a More Polished and Feature-Rich Experience
ChatGPT has emerged as one of the most influential AI applications in recent years, and it continues to set the benchmark in the industry. Compared to DeepSeek, it provides a significantly more refined and feature-packed experience. Some of its standout capabilities include:
Image Processing – ChatGPT can interpret uploaded images, charts, and other graphics. Additionally, it can generate images using DALL·E 3.
Voice Mode – Users can engage in spoken conversations with ChatGPT. Its advanced voice mode even allows for interruptions during responses and supports real-time camera-based vision assistance.
Custom Instructions and Memory – ChatGPT allows users to provide specific instructions or request that it remember certain details to personalize interactions.
Seamless Integrations – ChatGPT integrates with numerous applications, including Zapier, enabling users to incorporate AI into their daily workflows.
Collaboration Through ChatGPT Canvas – This Google Docs-like workspace facilitates real-time AI-human collaboration for writing and coding projects.
Custom GPTs – Users can create their own tailored versions of ChatGPT to better suit specific needs.
Desktop Applications – Unlike DeepSeek, which is only available on web and mobile, ChatGPT offers dedicated desktop apps for Windows and Mac, enhancing accessibility.
Automation Capabilities – ChatGPT supports scheduled tasks, enabling users to automate certain processes.
Organizational Features – While not extensively developed, ChatGPT includes basic tools to help users manage and organize their AI-generated content.
Enterprise and Team Support – ChatGPT offers collaboration-friendly features tailored for businesses.
Beyond these functionalities, ChatGPT simply provides a more refined user experience. In contrast, DeepSeek—while impressive—still feels like an evolving product that has yet to match ChatGPT’s level of maturity and stability.
Now, let’s compare their responses across different categories.
Performance Comparison Across Different Use Cases
1. Creative Writing
Prompt: "Write a 200-word blog post introducing the concept of AI-driven content creation for businesses."
Criteria | DeepSeek | ChatGPT |
Engagement | Conversational and engaging tone | Professional and formal approach |
Examples | Includes specific AI tools and automation techniques | Provides an overview of AI in content creation |
Structure | Includes headings and bullet points for clarity | Organized response with detailed paragraphs |
Focus | Discusses challenges and practical applications | Highlights long-term impact on marketing strategies |
Analysis: DeepSeek delivers a more engaging and structured response, making it accessible to a general audience. ChatGPT provides a more technical and formal approach, ideal for expert readership.
2. General Knowledge
Prompt: "Can you explain machine learning in simple terms?"
Criteria | DeepSeek | ChatGPT |
Clarity | Concise and structured | Clear and well-explained |
Depth of Explanation | Includes real-world applications like recommendation systems | Covers key concepts, including supervised and unsupervised learning |
Engagement & Simplicity | Uses analogies and step-by-step breakdowns | Uses simple language with clear formatting |
Summary | Summarizes key points with a dedicated section | Provides a concluding statement |
Analysis: DeepSeek presents the information concisely, incorporating practical analogies for quick comprehension. ChatGPT excels in clarity and structured learning, making it ideal for educational purposes.
3. Problem-Solving
Prompt: "If we have a budget of $10,000, what is the most efficient way to implement AI tools for business automation?"
Criteria | DeepSeek | ChatGPT |
Clarity & Readability | Organized with detailed insights | Well-structured with clear steps |
Depth of Information | Provides cost breakdowns and tool comparisons | Covers different AI automation options and their benefits |
Actionability | Includes cost estimations and ROI analysis | Outlines a step-by-step implementation plan |
Technical Details | Explores specific AI tools, integrations, and scalability | Discusses ease of use and industry applications |
Analysis: DeepSeek delivers a more data-driven approach with financial calculations, making it useful for cost-conscious users. ChatGPT provides a step-by-step guide, useful for those seeking general advice.
4. Technical Understanding
Prompt: "What is the difference between deep learning and traditional machine learning in AI?"
Criteria | DeepSeek | ChatGPT |
Conciseness | Includes detailed explanations | Provides a structured comparison |
Structure & Readability | Offers a comprehensive breakdown | Uses a table format for quick reference |
Depth of Information | Explores algorithm complexities, neural networks, and data requirements | Covers basic concepts, efficiency, and use cases |
Practicality | Presents insights for AI engineers and developers | Presents information in a digestible format |
Analysis: DeepSeek provides an in-depth comparison, including technical insights, making it ideal for expert readers. ChatGPT presents a concise yet informative summary, making it easier for quick reference.
Final Verdict: Which Model Excels in Which Area?
Category | Best Performer | Why? |
Creative Writing | DeepSeek | Engaging and structured response |
General Knowledge | ChatGPT | Clear and well-explained concepts |
Problem-Solving | DeepSeek | Detailed insights and financial breakdowns |
Technical Understanding | DeepSeek | Comprehensive technical insight |
ChatGPT vs. DeepSeek: A Feature and Performance Comparison
ChatGPT Offers a More Polished and Feature-Rich Experience
ChatGPT has emerged as one of the most influential AI applications in recent years, and it continues to set the benchmark in the industry. Compared to DeepSeek, it provides a significantly more refined and feature-packed experience. Some of its standout capabilities include:
Image Processing – ChatGPT can interpret uploaded images, charts, and other graphics. Additionally, it can generate images using DALL·E 3.
Voice Mode – Users can engage in spoken conversations with ChatGPT. Its advanced voice mode even allows for interruptions during responses and supports real-time camera-based vision assistance.
Custom Instructions and Memory – ChatGPT allows users to provide specific instructions or request that it remember certain details to personalize interactions.
Seamless Integrations – ChatGPT integrates with numerous applications enabling users to incorporate AI into their daily workflows.
Collaboration Through ChatGPT Canvas – This Google Docs-like workspace facilitates real-time AI-human collaboration for writing and coding projects.
Custom GPTs – Users can create their own tailored versions of ChatGPT to better suit specific needs.
Desktop Applications – Unlike DeepSeek, which is only available on web and mobile, ChatGPT offers dedicated desktop apps for Windows and Mac, enhancing accessibility.
Automation Capabilities – ChatGPT supports scheduled tasks, enabling users to automate certain processes.
Organizational Features – While not extensively developed, ChatGPT includes basic tools to help users manage and organize their AI-generated content.
Enterprise and Team Support – ChatGPT offers collaboration-friendly features tailored for businesses.
Beyond these functionalities, ChatGPT simply provides a more refined user experience. In contrast, DeepSeek—while impressive still feels like an evolving product that has yet to match ChatGPT’s level of maturity and stability.
DeepSeek’s Advantage Lies in Cost and Accessibility
DeepSeek's rapid rise in popularity can be attributed to three key factors:
Its models offer performance comparable to OpenAI’s.
It is open-source, allowing users to download, run, and customize models as needed.
It is significantly more affordable to operate.
By providing similar performance while offering greater control at a lower cost, DeepSeek has positioned itself as a compelling alternative to proprietary AI solutions.
DeepSeek’s Free Access Model
For most users, the biggest draw of DeepSeek is that it is currently free. Through its web and mobile applications, users can access DeepSeek’s most advanced models without major restrictions. While there may be a daily cap of 50 messages for DeepSeek R1, official confirmation is lacking.
In contrast, ChatGPT’s free plan comes with significant limitations. Free-tier users have access to GPT-4o Mini, limited GPT-4o usage, and a restricted feature set. To unlock ChatGPT’s full potential, users must subscribe to ChatGPT Plus for $20 per month.
DeepSeek Has Some Drawbacks
Despite its impressive capabilities, DeepSeek has its share of limitations. The platform has faced server instability, with periods where users are unable to generate responses due to heavy traffic. Additionally, DeepSeek lacks vision-based AI capabilities, a feature that ChatGPT users frequently rely on for extracting information from images.
Another critical concern is data security and regulatory risks. Being developed in China, DeepSeek operates under regulations that could allow government access to user data. While this may not be a major issue for casual users, businesses and professionals handling sensitive information might find this a significant drawback.
Moreover, censorship and content restrictions on DeepSeek go beyond standard AI safety protocols. While all AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, impose restrictions on harmful content (such as instructions for illegal activities), DeepSeek enforces additional censorship aligned with Chinese government policies. This includes topics related to political dissent, historical events, and certain global figures.
Another risk to consider is potential regulatory action from the US or EU, which could result in limitations or bans on DeepSeek’s services in the near future.
Conclusion: Which AI Model Should You Choose?
DeepSeek is a groundbreaking model with remarkable efficiency and cost advantages, making it ideal for developers and budget-conscious users. However, ChatGPT remains the superior choice for professional, polished, and feature-rich AI interactions. If you require multimodal capabilities, security, and extensive integrations, ChatGPT is the clear winner. If free, open-source access and efficiency are your priorities, DeepSeek is worth exploring.
What Do You Think?
Have you tried both? Let us know your thoughts in the comments
Kommentare